こんにちは。この映画も何度も観ている映画のひとつです。映画の感想ってその映画を観ながら考えたことなので、別に本当に監督がそういう意図で作っていなくても僕がそう感じたということが大事だな、と思ったのでそういう風に書いていきます。刑務官という特殊な仕事を扱った映画は珍しいです。刑事に比べると地味に思う刑務官ですが、大切な仕事です。しかし映画を観て分かる通り相当ストレスのある仕事だと思われます。主人公の小林薫の演技が刑務官という仕事で生きてきた男というのを見事に演じています。こういう演技、感情があるのかないのか、脱力していてなにかを見つめるみたいな演技は小林薫はやはり上手いです。死刑囚の金田(西島秀俊)と主人公の平井(小林薫)の結婚相手の美香(大塚寧々)の息子である達哉は、僕が観る限り同じ人物、或いは達哉が成長した姿が金田として描かれていると思いました。まず共通点があります。絵が好きなことです。割としつこく金田も達哉も絵を描くシーンが出てきます。そしてシーンを跨いでこの二人が繋がった行動をしている箇所も幾つかありました。例えば、金田が就寝時刻になって寝ようとしたときに平井に頭を出して寝るな、と言われるシーン、多分ここで平井と美香の結婚の絵を描いていると思われるシーンですが、この後に達哉と美香が電車で寝ているシーンが繋げられています。冒頭に電車で平井が達哉になにか面白いもの見える？と聞いて、達哉が車窓からなにかを見つめているシーンの後に金田の部屋の窓、つまり金田の目線のカットが繋げられていることからも金田=達哉は多分間違いないと思います。この映画の特徴は形式的な会話が多いことです。そのなかで金田と平井だけが、本心でお互いに喋っているように見えます。それは友達のようであり親子のようでもあります。金田の部屋で一度だけ金田が殺したと思われる老夫婦が映るシーンがあります。結構恐いシーンで老夫婦は睨むわけでもなく、ただ微笑んで見守っています。その後のシーンでその場所を振り返っていることから多分ずっと居るのでしょうね。加害者の家族の苦しみも描かれています。被害者の家族は何故かでてきません。刑務官がずっと世話した犯罪者に情を抱くのは考えれば分かることですが、それは犯罪者の死までの話です。でもこれは時間が短いだけであって、それは夫婦でも親子でも同じことです。犯罪者の人権をどこまで認めるか、というのは難しい問題です。インターネットでもよく議論されていますが、人を殺した人間を死刑にして何が悪いのか、という考えもあります。一方先進国では死刑廃止の国も多くあります。当事者にならないと何もいえないとは思いますが、僕は同じ罰を与えるべきだと思うので、死刑に賛成です。何人殺さないと死刑にならないみたいなことを前に聞いたことがあります。今調べると「永山基準」というのがあってそれに則って死刑が決まるらしいです。
Hello. This movie is also one of the movies I have watched many times. I thought about the impression of the movie while watching the movie, so I thought it was important that I felt that way even if the director didn't really make it with that intention, so I will write it that way. .. Movies dealing with the special job of a prison officer are rare. It's a prison officer who feels more modest than a detective, but it's an important job.However, as you can see from the movie, it seems to be a very stressful job. The acting of the main character, Kaoru Kobayashi, is a wonderful performance of a man who has lived in the job of a prison officer. Kaoru Kobayashi is also good at acting like this, whether or not he has emotions, or acting like he is weak and staring at something.Tatsuya, the son of Mika (Nene Otsuka), the marriage partner of the death row prisoner Kaneda (Hidetoshi Nishijima) and the main character Hirai (Kaoru Kobayashi), is depicted as Kaneda as far as I can see. I thought it was. First of all, they have something in common. I like painting. There will be scenes where both Kaneda and Tatsuya draw pictures. And there were some places where these two people were connected to each other across the scene.For example, when Kaneda tries to go to bed at bedtime, he is told not to put his head out to sleep, and maybe he is drawing a picture of Hirai and Mika's marriage here. After this, the scene where Tatsuya and Mika are sleeping on the train is connected.At the beginning, can you see something interesting about Tatsuya Hirai on the train? I think that Kaneda = Tatsuya is probably correct because the window of Kaneda's room, that is, the cut of Kaneda's line of sight is connected after the scene where Tatsuya is staring at something from the car window. The feature of this movie is that there are many formal conversations. Among them, only Kaneda and Hirai seem to be talking to each other in earnest. It's like a friend and a parent and child.There is a scene in Kaneda's room where an old couple who seems to have been killed only once is reflected. The old couple isn't glaring at the pretty scary scene, they just smile and watch over. Perhaps I've been there all the time because I'm looking back at that place in the subsequent scenes. The suffering of the perpetrator's family is also depicted. The victim's family does not come for some reason.It's easy to see that prison officers have a crush on the criminals they've taken care of all the time, but that's until the criminal's death. But this is only a short time, and it is the same for couples and parents. The extent to which the human rights of criminals are recognized is a difficult question. It is often discussed on the Internet, but there is also the idea of what is wrong with the death penalty for the person who killed the person.On the other hand, many developed countries have abolished the death penalty. I don't think I can say anything unless I become a party, but I think I should give the same punishment, so I agree with the death penalty. I've heard before that you can't be sentenced to death without killing how many people. Looking now, it seems that there is a "Nagayama Criteria" and the death penalty is decided according to it.
